My
Documents: Ecclesiology
The Duties and Qualifications
of Ruling Elders Part II
John
S. Watkins
Watkins was born in Virginia in 1844, and studied at Union Theological
Seminary from 1869 to 1872 under Robert L. Dabney and Thomas E. Peck. He was
afterwards pastor at Roanoke, Va., Raleigh, N. C., and Spartanburg, S. C. The
following is excerpted from his A Hand-Book for Ruling Elders, published
at Richmond in 1895 by the Committee of Publication of the Southern Presbyterian
Church.
(d) Ruling elders should take careful oversight of the children of their
flock. Many of us who are rulers fail to realize the peculiarity of our
relation to the children under our care. The offspring of believing parents are
admitted into the church by baptism, and this gives them special claims upon us.
They are within the pale of the church, and are committed to our supervision and
care. They are under its government and subject to its discipline. We are
therefore bound to take a deep and affectionate interest in them, and watch for
their souls as they who must give account. We are solemnly pledged to use all
diligence to provide proper instruction and training for them, and to endeavor
to save them from the snares and perils of the world. Through the formative
period of childhood and youth our eye should be upon them, and we should never
cease to pray and labor for them until they are brought to Christ. Baptized
members who grow up to manhood and persist in rejecting Christ and living in
sin, should be followed with tender interest, and kindly admonished and reminded
of their relations to the church. They should be dealt with faithfully, and
disciplined, if necessary. The church has lost many of her children by forsaking
them too soon and failing to do her duty towards them. She should never forget
that she is a foster-mother to her children, that she has fixed upon them the
seal of the covenant, and can never secure exemption from the duty of Christian
nurture. While the parent has his distinctive obligations, the church, as an
organization, has likewise most solemn duties to perform. A list of all the
baptized children should be kept by the session, and should be revised from time
to time. God's covenant is with his people and their seed. Their children
are heirs of the promise, and should be reminded, as soon as they have a
sufficient degree of intelligence, of their privileges and obligations. Elders
should be careful not to interfere with parental rights, and should seek to
influence the child through the parent. The children of God's people are the
hope of the church.
Elders should not only take an active part in the
training of Christ's children, but should see to it that all the children under
their supervision are properly instructed in the word of God. Children should be
required to memorize verses of Scripture. Dr. James W. Alexander gives the
following emphatic testimony on this point: "I venture my judgment that if a
pupil must forego one or the other — the explanation of the meaning by question
and answer, or the possession of the text in his memory verbatim — he had
better let go the former. There is no part of household and juvenile learning so
valuable as what in good old idiomatic mother-English is called 'getting verses
by heart.' Having almost worn out my eyes by reading and study, let me testify
that of all I ever learned I most prize is the knowledge of the English Bible,
and for one verse I know by heart I wish I knew a hundred."
A point of
importance is the exaltation of God's word. In these days of black-boards,
orchestras, story books, and appliances of all kinds, the Bible itself may fail
to be properly emphasized. Children should be taught to handle their Bibles, to
find the verses promptly, to compare Scripture with Scripture, and to have the
utmost reverence for the word of God.
There should be definite teaching
also, as to the structure and government of our church. Without being
controversial or comparative, it should be distinct and positive. Questions from
the Shorter Catechism should be memorized by the scholars regularly. Many of our
children grow up utterly ignorant of the meaning of Presbyterianism, having
never been taught its distinctive principles and scriptural grounds; and this
accounts for the easy manner in which they sometimes drift into other
churches.
(e) The elder has most important duties to perform in the
exercise of his joint power in the meetings of the session. A full
attendance is almost indispensable to efficiency. They are bound by solemn vows
to attend the regular meetings, which should be held at least monthly. Business
should not be conducted in a hurried or perfunctory manner. It will be found
helpful to follow a docket which brings up in regular order every matter which
may come up for consideration.
The admission of applicants to the
fellowship of the church is a duty of the session in its collective capacity,
which involves great responsibility. Upon its proper discharge depends largely
the purity of the church. Candidates are sometimes examined and received in a
very slip-shod manner. While the candidate should be spared needless
catechising, it is the plain duty of the rulers of God's house to require
credible evidence of saintship, and endeavor to find out whether he has an
intelligent view of the way of salvation, and has sincerely and heartily
embraced Christ as Saviour. They manifest the truest interest in him by
satisfying themselves that he is a genuine believer, and trying to save him from
fostering a delusion. It is no kindness to a person to receive him into the
church when he is not a Christian. Too often elders entrust this solemn duty of
examining applicants to impulsive and inexperienced young ministers, yielding
assent to the judgment of the latter without due deliberation.
We cannot
prevent the tares from growing up with the wheat, but should consider that the
demand of the times is for a purer and more consecrated church, for quality
rather than quantity. We may put ourselves at a disadvantage by the side of
other denominations by using great caution in receiving applicants, but in the
end we will be the richer for it; for the day is coming when "the fire shall try
every man's work of what sort it is."
The administration of church
discipline is another important duty belonging to the session in its collective
capacity. We are not disposed to croaking or pessimism, but we fear there has
been a down-grace movement along this line. The reclamation of offenders and the
honor of Christ demand more fidelity on the part of spiritual rulers in this
respect. It is too often the case that professing Christians are allowed to
continue in open and known sin without receiving a rebuke or a warning. Much
wisdom and tact are necessary to deal rightly with offending members. The
disposition and environment of each one should be taken into consideration; and
the great end of discipline should be kept constantly in mind, viz., the welfare
of the transgressor. If he is dealt with affectionately and firmly, he will
generally acknowledge the truth, and it will not be necessary to have recourse
to a formal trial. This subject opens up a large field for discussion, upon
which the writer cannot enter at this time. It may be said, however, that deep
piety, loyalty to Christ, a good stock of common sense, and a tender, sincere
interest in the spiritual welfare of offenders, will generally lead to right
conclusions as to the best manner of dealing with them.
At the meetings
of session, pastor and elders should consider the situation and needs of the
church, and should confer together as to the best means for increasing church
activity, stimulating its benevolence and deepening its piety. The roll of
membership should be examined, and arrangements made for the visitation of the
sick, the afflicted, and the needy. And elders should not regard themselves as
advisers merely and collectors of information for the pastor, but as co-workers
with him.
Sessions should not forget their relations to the ungodly
community outside of the church, and should regard themselves as an aggressive
body bound to render valiant service in battling with the powers of darkness.
The talents and zeal of all church members should be utilized in this great
work. The church will never reach the highest degree of efficiency until every
member regards himself as an evangelist in the wide sense of the
word.
Finally, the rulers of God's house should endeavor to work together
in harmony and love. Any alienation between elders, any quarrels or
misunderstandings, greatly impair the usefulness of the session as a court of
Christ.
IV. The Elder in the Highest Courts
Ministers and
elders have equal rights in the courts of the church. Ministers who are trained
in public speaking, and are more intimately acquainted with theological and
ecclesiastical questions, are naturally expected to take a more prominent part
in public discussions. At the same time, our elders should feel more deeply the
grave responsibility upon them. He may render invaluable service by making brief
practical suggestions, by giving wise advice in committee work, and giving
careful attention to the transaction of business. Their talents, their knowledge
of business and of practical affairs, should be utilized more extensively for
the good of the church in the higher courts. A too exclusive control of the
affairs of the church by ministers should be studiously avoided. Monopolies have
their dangers, even in the hands of good men. We believe that a larger infusion
of eldership influence and power would, in a measure, correct the present
tendency of our church courts to devote too much time to the discussion of nice
ecclesiastical and theological points, and to the transaction of mere routine
business. Our courts have a vast deal of work to do which is closely connected
with the life of the church and the progress of the gospel throughout the world.
They should give much time and thought to the great work of home and foreign
missions. Ways and means should be devised for overtaking the destitutions
within their bounds, for reaching the neglected classes, for encouraging and
supporting weak churches, and for stimulating interest in the progress of the
kingdom of our Lord.
We wish to emphasize the fact that our Presbyterian
system embodies the grand idea of the unity of the church. Each church with its
officers is a part of the great whole, and is organically connected with it. The
spiritual rulers of a congregation belong, in a certain sense, to the church as
a whole, and have duties to discharge growing out of this relation. In the
presbytery they are not to consider merely the interests of their individual
churches, but must devote themselves to the work of presbyterial oversight and
inspection. As in our political government, representatives who are sent to
Congress are charged, not merely with the interests of their constituency, but
with those of the government at large, so the church representatives in our
General Assembly are expected to legislate for the good of all under its care.
They should feel that they are directly responsible to Jesus Christ, who is head
over all things to the church, and the sole administrator of the kingdom of
grace. He is the source of all spiritual life and of all spiritual power, and he
has ordained the church to be the great agent for the evangelization of the
world.
Christ has given the church an organization which is sufficient to
develop and direct the energies of his people in the most effectual way, so that
she is thoroughly equipped for her great work. It is the duty of his people
faithfully and carefully to guard her as a divine institution, to uphold her
sacred ordinances, and insist upon her prerogatives. "He gave some apostles and
some prophets, and some evangelists, and pastors, and some teachers: for the
perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the
body of Christ."
The Qualifications of
Elders
The qualifications of elders are
plainly laid down in the word of God. Titus 1:5-9: "For this cause left I thee
in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and
ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee; if any be blameless, the
husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. For
a bishop must be blameless, as the steward of God; not self-willed, not soon
angry, not given to wine, no striker, not given to filthy lucre; but a lover of
hospitality, a lover of good men, sober, just, holy, temperate; holding fast the
faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both
to exhort and to convince the gainsayers."
I Timothy 3:2-7: "A bishop
then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good
behavior, given to hospitality, apt to teach; not given to wine, no striker, not
greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; one that
ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
(for if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the
church of God?) not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the
condemnation of the devil. Moreover he must have a good report of them which are
without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil."
Our Book
of Church Order sums up the qualifications as follows: "Those who fill this
office ought to be blameless in life and sound in the faith; they should be men
of wisdom and discretion; and by the holiness of their walk and conversation
should be examples to the flock." In detailing the duties of elders we
necessarily anticipated some of the qualifications.
The passages quoted
from Timothy and Titus lay special emphasis upon Christian character. The
indispensable and supreme qualification for a ruling elder is piety. First of
all, he must be a godly, spiritually-minded man. The religious condition of a
church depends largely upon the spiritual character of its officers. Their
influence is felt through the whole congregation.
The church ruler,
therefore, should "take heed unto himself as well as unto the doctrine." His
real worth is the measure of his influence. His piety is the measure of his
power with God and man. It becomes him to be imbued with the mind of Christ and
to be filled with the Holy Ghost. All the duties which devolve upon him are very
closely related to godliness. Without this trait, administrative ability,
knowledge, gift of speech, wealth and popularity will be of little avail. If he
is a truly godly man, a man of faith and prayer, other important qualifications
will naturally follow. But though piety is indispensable, it is not the only
qualification. Our congregations should be taught that not every church member
who is a devout Christian is qualified, as a matter of course, to be a ruler in
the house of God. When we consider the duties belonging to this office, it is
evident that intelligence, practical wisdom, experience, and administrative
capacity are likewise necessary.
The best and wisest men among us should
be selected. Our people should keep in mind that this office is not a mere
arrangement of human expediency arising out of certain felt necessities, but
finds its origin and authority in apostolic teaching and example. Congregations
sometimes make a sad and egregious mistake in electing a man to the eldership
because they wish to pay him a compliment, or because he occupies high social
position and possesses wealth and distinction. Wealth unquestionably gives power
and influence; but neither riches nor wealth nor social position can qualify a
man to be a ruler in God's house. It is a matter of great importance that elders
should be men of intelligence and influence. They are sometimes called upon to
deal officially with questions of vast importance and to grapple with problems
which perplex the ablest thinkers and theologians. To be destitute of mental
capacity is to be disqualified for the elder's office. We are well aware of the
fact that nearly all of our churches have great difficulty in securing a staff
of thoroughly competent men for the eldership.
The apostle tells us that
an elder should be "apt to teach." The reference is not necessarily to public
and official instruction. There must be, however, some faculty for the
communication of knowledge. It is important that our elders should use every
opportunity within their reach to store their minds with religious knowledge.
They should be faithful and prayerful students of God's word, so that they may
be able to work efficiently in the Bible class, and guide inquirers
intelligently. They should study carefully the standards of the church, and be
able to explain the scriptural grounds of Presbyterianism. Soundness in the
faith is an important qualification. The churches which were planted and
nourished by the apostles began to deteriorate very soon after their death, and
errors of all kinds crept in through false teachers. The rapid departure of some
of the apostolic churches from the simplicity which is in Christ and from purity
of doctrine clearly shows the necessity of having sound and orthodox
rulers.
The elder who reads these pages may be discouraged on account of
the very high standard of duty which is advocated. Let him remember that ideals
rightly used not only produce a blessed discontent, but at the same time
stimulate and inspire. They prevent stagnation. They lift us up and make us
aggressive. |