The
Westminster Confession of Faith
The Calling of the Westminster
Assembly
John Murray
From The Presbyterian
Guardian, volumes 11 and 12 (1942-1943)
It should be conceded,
without fear of intelligent contradiction, that the Westminster Confession of
Faith, Larger and Shorter Catechisms are the finest creedal formulations of the
Christian Faith that the church of Christ has yet produced. This is not to deny
that in certain particulars some other creeds may surpass these Westminster
standards, nor does it mean that these standards have attained such a degree of
perfection that they could not possibly be improved. But it does mean that they
are the most perfect creedal exhibitions that we possess of the truth revealed
in Holy Scripture. Many people are familiar with the Confession and Catechisms
and yet know very little regarding the history of the Assembly that produced
these documents.
One of the most important Parliaments that ever existed
in England was what is known as the Long Parliament. It continued from November
1640, until it was dissolved by Oliver Cromwell in April 1653. It was this
Parliament that was responsible for the calling of the Westminster Assembly of
Divines.
Shortly after the Long Parliament began its work, the House of
Lords appointed a committee consisting of ten bishops and twenty lay peers to
take into consideration all innovations in the church concerning religion. In
the autumn and winter of 1641 there was prepared what is known as the Grand
Remonstrance of the House of Commons. In this remonstrance the desire was
expressed that there should be "a general Synod of the most grave, pious,
learned and judicious divines of this island, assisted by some from
foreign parts professing the same religion with us, to consider all things
necessary for the peace and good government of the Church."
In 1642 a
declaration of the Parliament of England was sent to the General Assembly of the
Church of Scotland. This declaration contained a plea for the prevention of
civil war. The answer of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland deplored
the tardiness with which the reformation of religion progressed, and contended
that religion is not only the means of the service of God and the saving of
souls but also "the base and foundation of kingdomes and estates". It also
reiterated the plea "that in all his Majestie's dominions there might be one
Confession of Faith, one Directory of Worship, one publick Catechisme, and one
form of Kirk Government".
On April 19, 1642, the House of Commons ordered
that the names of divines fit to be consulted with be presented to the House. In
less than a week this list was completed. It consisted of two divines from each
county in England, two from each university, two from the Channel Islands, one
from each county in Wales, and four from the city of London.
On May 9th
of this year the bill for the calling of an assembly of divines was brought in
to the House of Commons. The House of Lords slightly amended the bill and
fourteen names were added to the list of divines. By June 1st, the bill passed
both Houses of Parliament. But the King's assent was withheld. Two other bills
met with the same fate. Both Houses then resorted to the method of Ordinance by
their own authority. By June 12, 1643, this Ordinance for the calling of an
assembly passed both Houses. As so much interest and importance attach to this
Ordinance, part of it should be quoted here. It reads thus:
"Whereas,
amongst the infinite blessings of Almighty God upon this nation, none is or can
be more dear unto us than the purity of our religion; and for that, as yet, many
things remain in the Liturgy, Discipline, and Government of the Church, which do
necessarily require a further and more perfect reformation than as yet hath been
attained; and whereas it hath been declared and resolved by the Lords and
Commons assembled in Parliament, that the present Church-government by
archbishops, bishops, their chancellors, commissaries, deans, dean and chapters,
archdeacons, and other ecclesiastical officers depending upon the hierarchy, is
evil, and justly offensive and burdensome to the kingdom, a great impediment to
reformation and growth of religion, and very prejudicial to the state and
government of this kingdom; and that therefore they are resolved that the same
shall be taken away, and that such a government shall be settled in the Church
as may be most agreeable to God's holy word, and most apt to procure and
preserve the peace of the Church at home, and nearer agreement with the Church
of Scotland, and other Reformed Churches abroad; and, for the better effecting
hereof, and for the vindicating and clearing of the doctrine of the Church of
England from all false calumnies and aspersions, it is thought fit and necessary
to call an Assembly of learned, godly, and judicious Divines, who, together with
some members of both the Houses of Parliament, are to consult and advise of such
matters and things, touching the premises, as shall be proposed unto them by
both or either of the Houses of Parliament, and to give their advice and counsel
therein to both or either of the said Houses, when, and as often as they shall
be thereunto required."
Chapter XXIII of the Westminster Confession of
Faith deals with "the Civil Magistrate". Section III of this chapter reads as
follows: "The civil magistrate may not assume to himself the administration of
the Word and sacraments, or the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven: yet
he hath authority, and it is his duty, to take order, that unity and peace be
preserved in the Church, that the truth of God be kept pure and entire; that all
blasphemies and heresies be suppressed; all corruptions and abuses in worship
and discipline prevented or reformed; and all the ordinances of God duly
settled, administered, and observed. For the better effecting whereof, he hath
power to call synods, to be present at them, and to provide that whatsoever is
transacted in them be according to the mind of God." The last sentence of this
section is the defense, on the part of the Westminster Assembly, of that
Ordinance of the English Parliament of 1643 in accordance with which the
Assembly convened on July 1st of that year. The Westminster Assembly was the
creature of the Long Parliament.
The Westminster divines did not, of
course, regard the authority of Parliament or of any civil magistrate as
essential to the calling of an assembly such as the Westminster Assembly was. In
Chapter XXXI, which deals with "Synods and Councils", the divines also said: "As
magistrates may lawfully call a synod of ministers, and other fit persons, to
consult and advise with, about matters of religion; so, if magistrates be open
enemies to the Church, the ministers of Christ of themselves, by virtue of their
office, or they, with other fit persons, upon delegation from their Churches,
may meet together in such assemblies" (Section II). Nevertheless the Westminster
Assembly was actually convened by Ordinance of Parliament.
The Assembly
consisted of some one hundred and fifty members. Thirty were members of
Parliament, the remainder divines, representing the chief parties of English
Protestants except that of Archbishop Laud.
The Assembly was called to
meet on July 1, 1643. Two days before the meeting a royal proclamation was
issued prohibiting the meeting. Notwithstanding this royal interdict, sixty-nine
of those appointed met. They convened in Westminster Abbey for divine service,
and both Houses of Parliament adjourned for the purpose of attending the service
of worship. Dr. Twisse, the prolocutor of the Assembly, preached. After divine
service the members of the Assembly met in the Chapel of Henry VII. The Assembly
adjourned until July 6th.
Certain instructions for the conduct of the
Assembly were framed by both Houses of Parliament in consultation with certain
of the divines. As given by John Lightfoot, a member of the Assembly, these read
as follows:
(1) That two Assessors be joined to the Prolocutor, to supply
his place in case of absence or infirmity. (2) That Scribes be appointed, to
set down all proceedings, and those to be Divines, who are not of the Assembly,
viz. Mr. Henry Robens and Mr. Adoniram Byfield. (3) Every member, at his
first entry into the Assembly, shall make serious and solemn protestation, not
to maintain any thing but what he believes to be truth in sincerity, when
discovered unto him. (4) No resolution to be given upon any question the same
day, wherein it is first propounded. (5) What any man undertakes to prove as
necessary, he shall make good out of Scripture. (6) No man to proceed in any
dispute, after the Prolocutor has enjoined him silence, unless the Assembly
desire he may go on. (7) No man to be denied to enter his dissent from the
Assembly, and his reasons for it, in any point, after it hath been first debated
in the Assembly, and thence (if the dissenting party desire it) to be sent to
the Houses of Parliament by the Assembly, not by any particular man or men, in a
private way, when either House shall require. (8) All things agreed on and
prepared for the Parliament, to be openly read and allowed in the Assembly, and
then offered as the judgment of the Assembly, if the major part assent. Provided
that the opinion of any persons dissenting, and the reasons urged for it, be
annexed thereunto, if the dissenters require it, together with the solutions, if
any were given to the Assembly, to these reasons.
When the Assembly met
on July 8th, the following protestation was taken by every member, Lords and
Commons, as well as divines: "I, A.B. do seriously and solemnly protest, in the
presence of Almighty God, that in this Assembly, whereof I am a member, I will
not maintain any thing in matters of doctrine, but what I think in my conscience
to be truth; or in point of discipline, but what I shall conceive to conduce
most to the glory of God, and the good and peace of his church." This
protestation, it should be noted, is of the nature of a solemn oath. It would be
well for all to be animated by the spirit that evoked its composition and by the
determination that the taking of it expresses.
In accordance with the
provisions of the Ordinance quoted above, the Assembly was largely occupied for
the first three months with the revision of the Thirty-Nine Articles of the
Church of England.
One of the most interesting accounts we possess of the
actual work of the Assembly is given us by Robert Baillie, one of the Scottish
commissioners to the Assembly. It gives us, from the pen of one admirably fitted
to write, a sample of actual procedure in the sessions of the Assembly. Under
date of December 7, 1643, Baillie writes:
"On Monday morning we sent to
both Houses of Parliament for a warrant for our sitting in the Assemblie. This
was readilie granted, and by Mr. Hendersone presented to the Proloqutor; who
sent out three of their number to convoy us to the Assemblie. Here no mortal man
may enter to see or hear, let be to sitt, without ane order in wryte from both
Houses of Parliament. When we were brought in, Dr. Twisse had ane long harangue
for our welcome, after so long and hazardous a voyage by sea and land, in so
unseasonable a tyme of the year. When he had ended, we satt doun in these places
which since we have keeped. The like of that Assemblie I did never see, and, as
we hear say, the like was never in England, nor any where is shortlie lyke to
be. They did sit in Henry the 7th's Chappell, in the place of the Convocation;
but since the weather grew cold, they did go to Jerusalem chamber, a fair roome
in the Abbey of Westminster, about the bounds of the College fore-hall, but
wyder. At the one end nearest the doore, and both sydes are stages of seats as
in the new Assemblie-House at Edinburgh, but not so high; for there will be
roome but for five or six score. At the upmost end there is a chair set on ane
frame, a foot from the earth, for the Mr. Proloqutor Dr. Twisse. Before it on
the ground stands two chairs for the two Mr. Assessors, Dr. Burgess and Mr.
Whyte. Before these two chairs, through the length of the roome, stands a table,
at which sitts the two scribes, Mr. Byfield and Mr. Roborough. The house is all
well hung, and hes a good fyre, which is some dainties at London. Foranent the
table, upon the Proloqutor's right hand, there are three or four rankes of
formes. On the lowest we five doe sit. Upon the other, at our backs, the members
of Parliament deputed to the Assemblie. On the formes foranent us, on the
Proloqutor's left hand, going from the upper end of the house to the chimney,
and at the other end of the house, and backsyde of the table, till it come about
to our seats, are four or five stages of fourmes, whereupon their divines sitts
as they please; albeit commonlie they keep the same place. From the chimney to
the door there is no seats, but a void for passage. The Lords of the Parliament
uses to sit on chaires, in the void, about the fire. We meet every day of the
week, but Saturday. We sitt commonlie from nine to one or two afternoon. The
Proloqutor at the beginning and end hes a short prayer. The man, as the world
knows, is very learned in the questions he has studied, and very good, beloved
of all and highlie esteemed; but merelie bookish, and not much, as it seems,
acquaint with conceived prayer, [and] among the unfittest of all the company for
any action; so after the prayer he sitts mute. It was the canny convoyance of
these who guides most matters for their own interest to plant such a man of
purpose in the chaire. The one assessour, our good friend, Dr. Whyte, hes keeped
in of the gout since our coming; the other, Dr. Burgess, a very active and
sharpe man, supplies, so farr as is decent, the Proloqutor's place. Ordinarlie
there will be present above three-score of their divines. These are divided in
three Committees; in one whereof every man is a member. No man is excluded who
pleases to come to any of the three. Every Committee, as the Parliament gives
order in wryte to take any purpose to consideration, takes a portion, and in
their afternoon meeting prepares matters for the Assemblie, setts doune their
minde in distinct propositions, backs their propositions with texts of
Scripture. After the prayer, Mr. Byfield the scribe, reads the proposition and
Scriptures, whereupon the Assemblie debates in a most grave and orderlie way. No
man is called up to speak; bot who stands up of his own accord, he speaks so
long as he will without interruption. If two or three stand up at once, then the
divines confusedlie calls on his name whom they desyre to hear first: On whom
the loudest and manifest voices calls, he speakes. No man speaks to any bot to
the Proloqutor. They harangue long and very learnedlie. They studie the
questions well before hand, and prepares their speeches; but withall the men are
exceeding prompt, and well spoken. I doe marvell at the very accurate and
extemporall replyes that many of them usuallie doe make. When, upon every
proposition by itself, and on everie text of Scripture that is brought to
confirme it, every man who will hes said his whole minde, and the replyes, and
duplies, and triplies, are heard; then the most part calls, To the question.
Byfield the scribe rises from the table, and comes to the Proloqutor's chair,
who, from the scribe's book, reads the proposition, and says, as many as are in
opinion that the question is well stated in the proposition, let them say I;
when I is heard, he says, as many as think otherwise, say No. If the difference
of I's and No's be cleare, as usuallie it is, then the question is ordered by
the scribes, and they go on to debate the first Scripture alleadged for proof of
the proposition. If the sound of I and No be near equall, then sayes the
Proloqutor, as many as say I, stand up; while they stand, the scribe and others
number them in their minde; when they sitt down, the No's are bidden stand, and
they likewise are numbered. This way is clear enough, and saves a great deal of
time, which we spend in reading our catalogue. When a question is once ordered,
there is no more debate of that matter; but if a man will vaige, he is quicklie
taken up by Mr. Assessor, or many others, confusedlie crying, Speak to order, to
order. No man contradicts another expresslie by name, bot most discreetlie
speaks to the Proloqutor, and at most holds on the generall, The Reverend
brother, who latelie or last spoke, on this hand, on that syde, above, or below.
I thought meet once for all to give yow a taste of the outward form of their
Assemblie. They follow the way of their Parliament. Much of their way is good,
and worthie of our imitation: only their longsomenesse is wofull at this time,
when their Church and Kingdome lyes under a most lamentable anarchy and
confusion. They see the hurt of their being to establish a new Plattforme of
worship and discipline to their Nation for all time to come, they think they
cannot be answerable, if solidlie and at leisure, they doe not examine every
point thereof." |